In an attempt to curtail the obesity epidemic, Mayor
Bloomberg of New York City proposed a ban on sugary drinks larger than 16
ounces in public places such as restaurants, street carts, sporting venues, and
theaters. This ban would not extend to diet drinks. Our discussion of the ban
in class sparked very heated conversation. There seemed to be a fairly general
consensus in our class (at least with the people I talked to) that this ban
will be completely ineffective. While I see that what the ban is trying to
achieve is positive and important, I agree with this consensus. Several fellow
MAC interns related this ban to prohibition, which was obviously a failure.
People don’t like being told how to live their lives. Also, people would still
be able to purchase these drinks. Large sizes would still be available in
grocery stores and they could always buy more than one small drink. I would
like to talk to someone who supports this ban in order to better understand his
or her line of thinking. For this blog post, we have been asked to incorporate
this ban into a high school lesson.
I plan to teach biology. A discussion of the politics
involved in this ban will not be particularly useful in biology class. I would,
however, introduce the topic and allow students to briefly discuss their
opinions. I believe, however, that a better approach to the obesity problem is
nutritional education. In my opinion, the government shouldn’t just start
banning all unhealthy food, but they should work on better educating the public
about nutrition. I would then launch into a discussion about the effects of excessive
sugar on our bodies, namely obesity. I would then link obesity to heart disease
and diabetes. I would also discuss the issue of hydration. Many kids believe
that they are being adequately hydrated by energy drinks and other heavily
caffeinated beverages. This is a myth that needs to be dispelled. Caffeine is a
diuretic, which is ultimately dehydrating. Sugar also has dehydrating effects. I
would, therefore, discuss the wonderfully healthy effects of drinking water and how all of our important bodily functions that rely heavily on plain old H2O.
One of the biggest surprises to me is the exclusion of diet
drinks in the ban. There is so much discussion in popular media right now about
the unhealthy and dangerous effects of artificial sweeteners. This information
has gone so far as to say that regular pop is actually better for you than diet pop. I would provide the students with
information that supports both sides of this argument. This is an important
discussion to have with students who may think that they are making a healthy
decision when opting for Diet Coke instead of a regular Coke.
Another exercise would be to compare different beverages.
What are the sugar differences between pop and fruit juices? What do we have to
watch out for when juice labels incorrectly say “all-natural” or “made with
real fruit”? Teaching students how to be investigators when it comes to finding
the healthiest food is very important. This involves teaching students how to
read the nutrition facts and ingredients of the food they choose. I want my
students to be knowledgeable and aware of what they are putting in their bodies.
http://blog.fooducate.com/tag/sugary-soft-drinks/
What a great lab experiment!
At the end of the class, I would again ask the students of
their opinions on the ban to see if it has changed. Is it necessary to actually
prohibit people from consuming these beverages or will simple education of
their dangers be sufficient?
